Metal Injection Molding (MIM) Advantages And Disadvantages
Metal Injection Molding Advantages And Disadvantages
Metal injection molding (MIM) fuses the versatility and cost savings of traditional plastic injection molding with the robustness and endurance of metal. This blog delves into the metal injection molding advantages and disadvantages, providing insights to assess whether MIM is the optimal manufacturing pathway for your product.
5 Advantages of Metal Injection Molding
MIM has many advantages over other manufacturing processes when the product to be produced needs to be complex in shape and small in size. Metal injection molding has 5 key advantages that make it a popular choice for manufacturing:
1. Complex Geometries
Metal injection molding (MIM) excels at crafting components with internal structures, thin walls, and complex shapes, enabling the creation of both functional and visually appealing parts. Beyond its capacity for intricate designs, MIM is also precise, offering tight tolerances, which is crucial for ensuring the proper fit and function of the component.
2. Cost-Effectiveness
Metal injection molding is considered cost-effective due to several reasons, including diminished labor requirements and minimal waste generation.
As MIM is an extensively automated technique, it lessens the reliance on human labor compared to conventional metalworking methods. This automation translates into considerable cost reductions, particularly for productions with large volumes.
Furthermore, the MIM technique produces negligible excess material, curtailing waste and its related expenses. Its precision also reduces the need for secondary operations, such as finishing and assembly, which can also result in cost savings.
3. Consistent Quality
Metal injection molding (MIM) is synonymous with uniformity and quality for several compelling reasons:
Repeatability:
Thanks to the sophisticated automation inherent in the MIM process, it guarantees uniform production of every part. This high level of consistency ensures that each manufactured component adheres strictly to the required design specifications and tolerances, minimizing the incidence of defects.
Consistent Raw Material Quality:
The MIM process starts with the creation of a metal powder that’s mixed with a binding material to form a feedstock. Metal powders used in the MIM process are highly consistent in composition and particle size, which ensures the predictability and consistency of the end product's quality.
Controlled Production Conditions:
Metal injection molding takes place in a controlled environment, reducing the risk of contamination and defects. The high pressure and heat applied during manufacturing also eliminate potential porosity or inclusions that might be present in the feedstock, ensuring the final parts meet the highest quality standards.
4. Material Selection
Metal injection molding offers an extensive selection of materials, such as stainless steel, titanium, and various low-alloy steels, providing engineers with the flexibility to select the most suitable material for their particular application needs.
5. Density & Strength
Metal injection molding produces components with exceptional density, conferring enhanced mechanical properties like robust strength and significant hardness, making it well-suited for parts that require resilience to high stress and extensive wear.
3 Disadvantages of Metal Injection Molding
1. Start-Up Costs
The initiation of metal injection molding operations necessitates a significant investment in specialized machinery, such as an injection molding apparatus, debinding ovens, and sintering furnaces. These costs can be particularly daunting for businesses that are just beginning to utilize MIM technology. Partnering with a MIM manufacturer that has existing MIM capabilities can mitigate these initial financial outlays.
2. Tooling Lead Times
The timeline to create a new mold and commence production of newly designed components can span from several weeks to months, more so for intricate designs. Such extended lead times may disrupt planned production timelines and potentially inflate costs as deadlines loom and the urgency to expedite processes increases.
3. Design Change Costs
Metal Injection Molding requires a specific mold for every unique part design, contributing to the total production expenditure. Should a design modification be necessary, crafting and manufacturing a fresh mold becomes essential, further extending lead times and elevating the costs involved.
Comparison Between MIM and Other Manufacturing Process
The table presents a comprehensive comparison between Metal Injection Molding (MIM) and various other manufacturing processes, including Traditional Powder Metallurgy, Investment Casting, Forging, 3D Printing, and LOMT. With the table, manufacturers and engineers are able to select the most appropriate process based on specific requirements of their projects.
| Features ManufacturingProcess |
Length Size | Products Weight | Density | Mold Life | Products Complexity | Material Options | Mass Production | Size Accuracy | Surface Roughness | Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Injection Molding(MIM) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Traditional Powder Metallurgy | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Investment Casting | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Forging | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| 3D Printing | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| LQMT | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
Comparison Between MIM and Traditional Powder Metallurgy (PM)
Advantages of MIM:
- MIM powder has small particles, higher activation energy than PM, denser sintering, and higher relative density.
- The force and friction of MIM mold are smaller than that of PM, and the mold life is longer.
- MIM injection material has higher fluidity than PM powder, so the product shape is more complex.
- MIM has a higher density than PM, and there are no visible holes on the surface, so the roughness is better than PM.
Disadvantages of MIM:
- MIM has more sintering shrinkage than PM, and if the size is too long, it is more likely to cause breakage or deformation.
- MIM adds more binding agents than PM, the debinding time is longer than PM, and the product weight should not be too heavy.
- The shrinkage of MIM is higher than that of PM, and the relative stability of dimensional accuracy is poor.
Comparison Between MIM and Lost Wax Casting
Advantages of MIM:
- MIM molds can generally be used 200,000 times, while lost-wax casting sand molds can only be used once.
- Lost-wax casting relies on natural gravity to pour molten slurry. The product is too complex and often solidifies before filling.
- MIM molding time is short and continuous production has high mass production efficiency.
- MIM uses steel molds to form with higher precision than the sand molds used in lost-wax casting.
- MIM uses steel molds with better surface roughness than sand molds used in lost-wax casting.
- The energy consumption, consumables and environmental pollution of lost-wax casting are higher than those of MIM, and the overall cost is higher.
Disadvantages of MIM:
- MIM products with longer length are prone to breakage and deformation due to sintering shrinkage, while lost wax casting does not have this problem.
- MIM needs to be degreased and the price of the powder is more expensive than the ingot cast by lost wax casting. The weight is too large and is not suitable.
Conclusion
In summary, the advantages and disadvantages of Metal Injection Molding (MIM) center on its high precision and cost-effectiveness for complex parts, balanced against initial setup costs and size limitations. MIM stands as a powerful manufacturing option when its benefits align with project goals. For those considering the intricate and cost-effective capabilities of Metal Injection Molding for their manufacturing needs, SZS is here to guide you through the process. Contact SZS today to find out how MIM can benefit your projects.
Related articles:
Metal Injection Molding vs Die Casting: A Comparative Analysis
Heat Treatment of Metals: Stages, Types and Benefits to Know
Other
MIM Material Introduction: High Strength Steel
With the advent of foldable phones, the traditional MIM stainless steel materials used in mobile phones can no longer meet the requirements of mechanical structure strength. If titanium alloy with low specific gravity and high strength is used instead, there are two problems: high price and reliability of properties. We must find higher strength and wear-resistant materials to meet the requirements of light, thin, short and small.
Advanced Materials Used In 3C Industry : MIM
The 3C industry uses a very high proportion of MIM-made parts. The important thing is that most 3C products will be in direct contact with human skin. Products that come into contact with the human body must pass skin sensitivity testing to avoid allergic reactions in people with specific sensitive skin. How to choose right material for product is one of important things.
Introduction of Pure Copper MIM Applications in 3C, Biological and Medical Industries
SZS developed copper feedstock for the MIM process. Pure copper has excellent electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, anti-magnetic and antibacterial properties. The following list is used in the 3C, biological and medical industries of pure copper MIM in various countries all over the world.